Race Bias in Hiring2024n = 3,000,000
LLMs preferred white-associated names 85% vs 9% Black (n>3M)
Across more than 3 million resume-to-job comparisons by three production LLMs, white-associated names were preferred 85% of the time vs 9% for Black-associated names; Black-male names were never preferred over white-male names.
Primary source
Wilson & Caliskan, AIES 2024 (NIST-funded)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20371Published 2024 — sample n = 3,000,000 — compiled by JobCannon Research.
Why this stat matters
This figure belongs to the race bias in hiringvertical of JobCannon's ongoing review of hiring, AI, and career-outcome research. We track it because it is one of the few primary-source estimates with a published sample, methodology, or legal record. Cite the original source first; this page exists to make the figure easy to find and link to.
Related stats
- 9.5% Black callback gap; 20% of firms drive half of it (n=83K+)Kline, Rose & Walters, NBER WP 29053 — 2024
- Whitened resumes doubled Black-candidate callbacks (10% to 25%)Kang, DeCelles, Tilcsik & Jun, Administrative Science Quarterly — 2016
- White-sounding names +50% more callbacks vs Black-sounding names (AER 2004, n~5K)Bertrand & Mullainathan, American Economic Review 94(4) — 2004
- No decline in racial hiring discrimination over 25 years -- 36% white callback advantage (PNAS)Quillian, Pager, Hexel & Midtboen, PNAS 114(41) — 2017
Find your career fit
JobCannon assessments map your strengths to careers using primary-source research like this one. Free, no signup required.
Take the RIASEC Test