A values assessment is a psychometric tool designed to reveal the motivational priorities that guide your decisions, behaviour, and sense of meaning. The most rigorously validated framework is the Schwartz Theory of Basic Human Values (1992), which identifies 10 universal values — Self-Direction, Stimulation, Hedonism, Achievement, Power, Security, Conformity, Tradition, Benevolence, and Universalism — validated across 80+ countries and diverse cultural contexts. The model has been replicated thousands of times and remains the gold standard in cross-cultural psychology.
At its core, the theory holds that values motivate behaviour and justify choices. When you take a job, leave a relationship, or make a financial decision, values are the invisible operating system running underneath. You may not consciously articulate them, but they determine what feels "right," what creates energy, and what drains it. Values also exist in a circular structure of compatibility and tension — some values reinforce each other (e.g. Benevolence and Universalism), while others create friction (e.g. Power and Universalism).
Career alignment occurs when your job's culture, demands, and structure resonate with your core values. Values conflict — sometimes called person-organisation misfit — is widely considered the primary cause of burnout and disengagement, beyond the frequently cited "bad boss" explanation. In fact, research suggests that a toxic manager is often a proxy symptom: the deeper problem is that the organisation's value system is fundamentally incompatible with the employee's own. Identifying your values is the first step to diagnosing that misfit before it costs you years.
Based on Schwartz's Theory of Basic Human Values — 10 universal motivational goals validated across cultures. Each profile below shows what drives high scorers, how they show up at work, and which environments bring out their best.
Core Drive
Independent thought, creativity, freedom, exploration, and the autonomy to set one's own goals and methods.
High Scorers
Low Scorers Tend Toward
Comfortable following direction, prefer structure and clear guidelines over open-ended freedom.
Career Match
Career Clash
Examples: Richard Feynman, Marie Curie, Steve Jobs
Core Drive
Excitement, novelty, challenge, and adventure — the need for variety and a life full of new experiences.
High Scorers
Low Scorers Tend Toward
Content with stable, predictable environments; finds comfort in mastery of a single domain.
Career Match
Career Clash
Examples: Anthony Bourdain, Elon Musk, Bear Grylls
Core Drive
Pleasure, enjoyment, gratification, and self-indulgence — maximizing positive experiences and minimizing discomfort.
High Scorers
Low Scorers Tend Toward
Willing to endure significant discomfort for purpose or duty; may find leisure-seeking shallow.
Career Match
Career Clash
Examples: Arianna Huffington (sleep advocacy), Tim Ferriss
Core Drive
Personal success, ambition, competence, and demonstrating capability according to social standards.
High Scorers
Low Scorers Tend Toward
Less motivated by external markers of success; may prioritize process over outcomes.
Career Match
Career Clash
Examples: Serena Williams, Jeff Bezos, Indra Nooyi
Core Drive
Social status, prestige, authority, control over resources, and influence over other people.
High Scorers
Low Scorers Tend Toward
Indifferent to hierarchy; may reject authority structures or prefer collaborative flat teams.
Career Match
Career Clash
Examples: Angela Merkel, Jack Welch, Christine Lagarde
Core Drive
Safety, stability, harmony, order, and health — for self, relationships, and society.
High Scorers
Low Scorers Tend Toward
Comfortable with risk and uncertainty; may actively seek instability as a growth signal.
Career Match
Career Clash
Examples: Typical long-tenure civil servants, Warren Buffett (investment philosophy)
Core Drive
Restraint of actions, impulses, and drives that might upset or harm others — respecting social norms, rules, and expectations.
High Scorers
Low Scorers Tend Toward
Willing to challenge norms; may view rule-following as obstacle to innovation.
Career Match
Career Clash
Examples: High-integrity regulatory professionals, classical civil servants
Core Drive
Respect for and commitment to cultural, family, or religious customs — humility, acceptance of one's lot, moderation.
High Scorers
Low Scorers Tend Toward
Forward-looking and change-embracing; may view traditions as barriers to progress.
Career Match
Career Clash
Examples: Pope Francis, community leaders, many NGO workers
Core Drive
Caring for the welfare of close others — loyalty, honesty, helpfulness, forgiveness, and genuine interpersonal warmth.
High Scorers
Low Scorers Tend Toward
More task-focused; may deprioritise relationship maintenance when goals are at stake.
Career Match
Career Clash
Examples: Mother Teresa, Fred Rogers, Brené Brown
Core Drive
Understanding, appreciation, tolerance, and protection of the welfare of all people and nature — justice, equality, world peace.
High Scorers
Low Scorers Tend Toward
More group-specific in loyalty; may prioritise in-group interests over global concerns.
Career Match
Career Clash
Examples: Malala Yousafzai, Paul Polman, Greta Thunberg
The research is clear: how well your values match your organisation's culture predicts your job satisfaction, commitment, and longevity far more reliably than salary or job title.
Person-organisation value congruence correlation (meta-analysis)
Higher than compensation predictors in most samples
Values clash outperforms salary dissatisfaction in predicting voluntary turnover
Large-scale meta-analyses (Cable & DeRue, 2002; Kristof-Brown et al., 2005) confirmed that person-organisation value congruence predicts job satisfaction (r = 0.44), organisational commitment (r = 0.47), and intent to stay — with effect sizes comparable to the strongest known predictors in industrial psychology.
Critically, values clash is more predictive of attrition than salary dissatisfaction. When an employee's core values are chronically violated by their organisation's culture — even in well-paid, prestigious roles — turnover intent rises sharply within 12–18 months. This explains why counter-offers rarely work: the employee isn't leaving for money, they're leaving because the environment conflicts with who they are.
| Value | Career Environment Match | Red-Flag Environments |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Direction | Autonomous roles, R&D, remote-first orgs | Micromanagement, scripted processes, no input on decisions |
| Stimulation | High-growth startups, dynamic industries | Static role, same tasks for years, stagnant team |
| Achievement | Meritocratic, data-driven cultures | No feedback, egalitarian pay regardless of output |
| Power | Large orgs with clear hierarchy, leadership track | Flat companies, no promotion path, title-blind culture |
| Security | Established firms, government, regulated industries | Series A startups, commission-only, high volatility |
| Conformity | Compliance, legal, quality-assurance roles | Chaos-tolerant cultures, "move fast and break things" |
| Tradition | Family business, cultural orgs, community institutions | Globalised disruption-first tech companies |
| Benevolence | Healthcare, education, mission-driven teams | Toxic competitive sales floors, high-churn environments |
| Universalism | NGO, sustainability, policy, impact investing | Companies with documented ESG failures, exploitative practices |
| Hedonism | Hospitality, luxury, wellness, high-comp lifestyle roles | Austerity cultures, heavy sacrifice for distant reward |
Each value translates into specific workplace needs. When those needs aren't met, performance and engagement decline — not because of laziness, but because of structural friction.
Workplace Needs
Autonomy to set own approach, minimal oversight, latitude over methods and priorities.
Workplace Needs
Measurable results, performance recognition, clear KPIs and visible milestones.
Workplace Needs
Team cohesion, interpersonal trust, caring manager, low internal competition.
Workplace Needs
Status markers, decision-making authority, formal titles, clear power hierarchy.
Workplace Needs
Clear expectations, job stability, predictable compensation, low role ambiguity.
Workplace Needs
Variety, new challenges, cross-functional exposure, fast-changing projects.
Workplace Needs
Social impact, ethical standards, transparency, mission-driven culture.
Workplace Needs
Pleasant physical environment, genuine work-life quality, absence of unnecessary drudgery, enjoyable team culture.
Workplace Needs
Clear protocols and procedures, respect for established processes, stable team culture without constant disruption.
Five action steps to turn your values profile into concrete career decisions.
Your highest-scoring values are your motivational core. These are the needs that, if chronically unmet, will cause disengagement regardless of salary or title. Write them down and treat them as primary filters in every career decision.
Score your current job on each of your top values from 1–10: does your role actively support this value (8–10), tolerate it (5–7), or conflict with it (1–4)? Any top value scoring below 5 is a structural risk factor for burnout worth addressing.
Use Glassdoor, LinkedIn employee posts, annual reports, and press coverage to look for evidence of your values in action. A company that claims "autonomy" in its careers page but has a 4:1 manager ratio or stacked ranking is a red flag for Self-Direction types.
Craft questions that surface real evidence: "Can you walk me through how the team decides what to work on next?" (Self-Direction), "How is performance recognised and rewarded?" (Achievement), "What happens when someone disagrees with a senior decision?" (Power/Conformity).
When comparing offers, build a simple matrix: rate each opportunity on your top 5 values (1–5 per value). A role that scores 25/25 at 80% of your target salary is usually a better long-term bet than a values-misaligned role paying 120% — research consistently shows the latter leads to voluntary exit within 18 months.
Work values are the principles and priorities that guide your career decisions—what matters most to you in a job. Common values include autonomy (independence), security (stability), achievement (measurable success), altruism (helping others), creativity (innovation), and work-life balance. When your job aligns with your values, satisfaction increases dramatically.
Our Values assessment takes 6-8 minutes and consists of 20 questions. You'll rank your top 5 work values and receive career recommendations that align with your priorities.
Research shows that value alignment is the #1 predictor of long-term job satisfaction—even more than salary or title. If you value creativity but work in a rigid bureaucracy, you'll feel unfulfilled regardless of pay. Conversely, a lower-paying job aligned with your values will feel more rewarding.
Yes, work values often shift with life stages. Early career, you might prioritize achievement and growth; mid-career, autonomy and impact; late career, work-life balance and mentorship. Major life events (parenthood, illness, financial changes) can reorder your values significantly.
Yes, our Values Assessment is 100% free with instant results. You receive a ranked list of your top work values, career recommendations aligned with those values, and insights into potential value conflicts — no registration required.
Absolutely. Values alignment is the foundation of effective career planning. Use your top values to filter job opportunities, evaluate offers, and negotiate working conditions. For example, if autonomy ranks highest, prioritize remote roles or freelance work over structured corporate positions.
Everything you need to know about values assessments, the science behind them, and how to act on your results.
A values assessment measures the degree to which a person prioritises fundamental motivational goals — things like autonomy, security, achievement, or caring for others. Unlike personality tests which describe how you behave, values tests measure what you want and what you believe is important. The gold standard framework is Shalom Schwartz's Theory of Basic Human Values (1992), which identified 10 universal values validated across 80+ countries and cultures.
Values are the deepest layer of what motivates you. When your job's culture, structure, and demands align with your core values, work feels meaningful and energising. When they conflict, even a well-paying job with good colleagues creates chronic low-grade stress that compounds into burnout. Meta-analyses consistently show that person-organisation value congruence is among the strongest predictors of job satisfaction, organisational commitment, and intent to stay — more predictive than salary in many studies.
Yes, gradually. Research by Schwartz and colleagues shows that values are relatively stable across years but do shift across major life stages. Security and Benevolence tend to increase after having children or experiencing economic disruption. Stimulation and Self-Direction peak in early adulthood and often moderate with age. Universalism tends to increase with education and cross-cultural exposure. This means it's worth re-assessing every 3–5 years, or after a significant life transition.
This is very common and actually predicted by Schwartz's circular model. Values that sit on opposite sides of the circle — like Power and Universalism, or Achievement and Benevolence — are inherently in tension. When you score high on both, you'll face genuine trade-offs in career decisions. The goal isn't to eliminate the conflict but to identify environments that allow your top value to dominate while giving your secondary values enough expression to avoid chronic frustration.
In large-scale workforce studies, the most commonly highly-rated work values are Security (stable employment), Benevolence (good colleagues, helping others), and Achievement (doing meaningful, competent work). Self-Direction is particularly prominent among knowledge workers and remote professionals. Power values are typically held by a smaller minority but are overrepresented in executive and leadership populations due to self-selection into hierarchical roles.
The Big Five (OCEAN) measures stable behavioural traits — how you typically think, feel, and act. Values assessments measure motivational priorities — what you consider important and worth pursuing. They answer different questions: Big Five tells you "how you operate," values tell you "what drives you." Both predict career satisfaction, but through different mechanisms. Big Five predicts fit with a role's task demands; values predict fit with an organisation's culture and purpose. Used together, they give a much fuller picture.
Remote work environments tend to select strongly for Self-Direction (high autonomy, low oversight), followed by Stimulation (self-motivated variety-seeking) and Achievement (results-oriented without social accountability cues). If you score high in Benevolence or Security, remote work can still be fulfilling — but you'll need explicit structures: regular team check-ins for Benevolence types, and clear role definitions and stable contracts for Security types. Power-oriented workers often find remote setups frustrating due to reduced visibility of status signals.
Start by identifying your top 2–3 values. Then use them as filters: (1) research company culture through Glassdoor, employee LinkedIn posts, and press coverage — look for evidence your values are active there. (2) In interviews, ask targeted questions: "How does the team handle autonomy vs. oversight?" or "How is success measured and recognised?" (3) Use your values to explain why you left past roles honestly without oversharing. (4) Treat values misalignment as a disqualifier equal in weight to bad compensation. A role that pays 20% more but violates your top value typically leads to resignation within 18 months.
Values are one lens. Combine them with personality, behaviour, and career fit assessments for a complete picture of who you are at work.
The gold-standard personality model: Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism.
Take the test →Nine core motivational patterns that reveal your deepest fears, desires, and growth paths.
Take the test →Match your strengths and interests to specific careers, industries, and remote roles.
Take the test →Understand your behavioural style — Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, Conscientiousness — and how you collaborate.
Take the test →