рдореБрдЦреНрдп рдордЬрдХреБрд░рд╛рдХрдбреЗ рдЬрд╛
JobCannon
рд╕рд░реНрд╡ рдХреМрд╢рд▓реНрдпреЗ

Metrics & Analytics

тмв рд╢реНрд░реЗрдгреА 2рдХреНрд╖реЗрддреНрд░реЗ
рдЙрдЪреНрдЪ
рдкрдЧрд╛рд░рд╛рд╡рд░реАрд▓ рдкрд░рд┐рдгрд╛рдо
3 рдорд╣рд┐рдиреЗ
рд╢рд┐рдХрдгреНрдпрд╛рд╕ рд▓рд╛рдЧрдгрд╛рд░рд╛ рд╡реЗрд│
рдордзреНрдпрдо
рдХрд╛рдард┐рдгреНрдп
7
рдХрд░рд┐рдЕрд░реНрд╕
рдПрдХрд╛ рджреГрд╖реНрдЯрд┐рдХреНрд╖реЗрдкрд╛рдд

Metrics & Analytics is the discipline of defining, measuring, and analyzing product/business metrics to drive decisions. Core skills: north-star metric selection, leading vs lagging indicators, dashboard design, cohort analysis, and statistical fundamentals. Career path: Data Analyst (junior, $85-115k) тЖТ Product Analyst (mid, $115-155k) тЖТ Head of Analytics (senior, $155-200k+). Built on SQL basics, statistics (sample size, significance), and tools (Mixpanel, Amplitude, Looker, Mode, Tableau, GA4). North-star metric = the one metric that measures customer value creation; everything else is a leading indicator or guardrail. Bad metrics = wrong priorities; good metrics = alignment, accountability, learning. OKRs + metric trees organize dozens of KPIs under one north star.

Metrics & Analytics рдореНрд╣рдгрдЬреЗ рдХрд╛рдп

Define, track, and analyze product metrics. Build dashboards, run experiments, make data-driven decisions. Essential for PM, growth, data roles. Learning Curve: Medium (SQL + statistics + product sense)

ЁЯФз рд╕рд╛рдзрдиреЗ рдЖрдгрд┐ рдкрд░рд┐рд╕рдВрд╕реНрдерд╛
MixpanelAmplitudeLookerTableauModeHexMetabasedbtPower BIGA4ChartMogul

ЁЯУЛ рд╕реБрд░реВ рдХрд░рдгреНрдпрд╛рдкреВрд░реНрд╡реА

ЁЯТ░ рдкреНрд░рджреЗрд╢рд╛рдиреБрд╕рд╛рд░ рдкрдЧрд╛рд░

рдкреНрд░рджреЗрд╢рдЬреНрдпреБрдирд┐рдпрд░рдордзреНрдпрдорд╕реАрдирд┐рдпрд░
USA$85k$115k$155k
UK┬г50k┬г75k┬г100k
EUтВм55kтВм85kтВм115k
CANADAC$85kC$120kC$160k

ЁЯОп Metrics & Analytics рд╡рд╛рдкрд░рдгрд╛рд░реА рдХрд░рд┐рдЕрд░

тЪЦ рдпрд╛рдВрдЪреНрдпрд╛рд╢реА рддреБрд▓рдирд╛ рдХрд░рд╛

тЭУ FAQ

What is a north-star metric and why does it matter?
A north-star metric is the single metric that directly measures customer value creation, the one metric your entire company optimizes for. Examples: Slack = DAU (daily active users), Stripe = transaction volume, Netflix = hours watched. It's north-star because it's (1) not vanity (moving it = moving business fundamentals), (2) measurable daily, (3) actionable (teams can influence it), (4) proportional to revenue. Without a north star, teams optimize local maxima (like signup growth) that destroy retention. Picking the wrong north star (like page views for a news site) leads to clickbait and churn.
OKRs vs metric trees, what's the difference?
OKRs (Objectives & Key Results) are goals + outcomes you want to move. Metric trees are the input/output relationships showing how to move them. Example OKR: 'Objective: increase user engagement. Key Result: grow DAU from 10k to 15k.' A metric tree for DAU shows: DAU = (Signups ├Ч Activation%) + (Existing ├Ч Retention%), if retention is the bottleneck, you focus on retention, not signups. OKRs are 'what we want to move'; metric trees are 'how things connect.' Use both: OKRs for direction + accountability, metric trees for diagnosis + prioritization.
Leading vs lagging indicators, when do I use each?
Lagging = historical (retention 30d, revenue, churn), tells you if something worked but it's too late to change course. Leading = predictive (signup rate, activation %, feature adoption %), tells you today if tomorrow will be good. In dashboards, use leading for daily/weekly decision-making (is onboarding healthy?), lagging for monthly/quarterly reviews (did we hit our goal?). Example funnel: signups (daily leading) тЖТ 7d activation % (leading) тЖТ 30d retention (lagging). If activation drops, you know retention will drop 30d later.
What makes a metric 'vanity' and how do I spot it?
Vanity metric = sounds impressive but doesn't predict business value. Examples: total signups (doesn't matter if 90% churn), page views (doesn't correlate with retention), daily active users (if they're not paying). Vanity metrics go up even when the business is broken. To spot them: (1) would losing 50% of this number hurt the business? (2) can any team directly influence it? (3) does it correlate with revenue/retention/engagement? If 'no', it's vanity. Real metrics are boring: MRR, LTV, retention rate, NPS, support tickets. Use vanity metrics for PR, use real metrics for decisions.
Cohort analysis: when to use retention tables vs survival curves?
Retention table = simple grid (cohort ├Ч week/month, cells = % retained), best for quick Monday-morning dashboards and spotting seasonal patterns. Survival curve = smooth line showing retention decay over weeks/months, best for understanding long-term trends, comparing product versions, and predicting LTV. Use both: tables for daily monitoring, curves for strategy meetings. If your retention tables are flat (steady 85%) you have a product-market fit signal. If they're declining (80% тЖТ 70% тЖТ 60%) you have a churn crisis; diagnose with exit surveys + usage segmentation.
What makes a good dashboard and how do I design one?
Good dashboard: (1) one metric per glance, no scrolling to see what matters; (2) clear hierarchy (north-star top, diagnostics below); (3) 3-5 snapshots only, not 20 (less = more); (4) contextual sparklines (is this metric up or down this week?); (5) drilldown capability (click funnel to see step-by-step); (6) automated alerts (ping Slack if metric drops >10% vs last week). Bad dashboard: 100+ tiles, same emphasis on everything, no context. Example: top row = [MRR sparkline | LTV trend | Churn rate], second row = [signup funnel | retention curve | NPS distribution]. Every metric answers a business question; remove anything decorative.
Data democratization, why does it matter and how do I set it up?
Data democratization = every team has self-service access to the metrics they need (via Looker, Mode, Tableau, etc.) instead of waiting for analysts. Why: (1) speed (PMs get answers in hours, not days), (2) ownership (teams own their metrics, not analysts), (3) learning (teams see patterns themselves). How: (1) define metric taxonomy (standardized names: signup_rate, not signup/day/new), (2) build a semantic layer / BI tool, (3) create dashboards per team (Growth = funnel + segments; Support = ticket volume + CSAT), (4) train teams on SQL/metrics basics, (5) centralize calculations (dbt for computed metrics). Without democratization, analytics is a bottleneck; with it, analytics scales.

рд╣реЗ рдХреМрд╢рд▓реНрдп рддреБрдордЪреНрдпрд╛рд╕рд╛рдареА рдпреЛрдЧреНрдп рдЖрд╣реЗ рдХрд╛, рдпрд╛рдЪреА рдЦрд╛рддреНрд░реА рдирд╛рд╣реА?

рдХрд░рд┐рдЕрд░ рдореЕрдЪ рдХрд░реВрди рдкрд╛рд╣рд╛ тАФ рдЖрдореНрд╣реА рдпреЛрдЧреНрдп рдорд╛рд░реНрдЧ рд╕реБрдЪрд╡реВ.

рдорд╛рдЭреНрдпрд╛рд╕рд╛рдареА рд╕рд░реНрд╡реЛрддреНрддрдо рдХреМрд╢рд▓реНрдпреЗ рд╢реЛрдзрд╛ тЖТ

рддреБрдордЪрд╛ рдЖрджрд░реНрд╢ рдХрд░рд┐рдЕрд░ рдорд╛рд░реНрдЧ рд╢реЛрдзрд╛

реи,релреирез рдХрд░рд┐рдЕрд░рдордзреНрдпреЗ рдХреМрд╢рд▓реНрдпрд╛рдВрд╡рд░ рдЖрдзрд╛рд░рд┐рдд рдЬреБрд│рдгреА. рдореЛрдлрдд, ~3 рдорд┐рдирд┐рдЯреЗ.

рдХрд░рд┐рдЕрд░ рдореЕрдЪ рдХрд░реВрди рдкрд╛рд╣рд╛ тАФ рдореЛрдлрдд тЖТ