Skip to main content
RelationshipsFramework-based· Attachment theory (Bowlby/Ainsworth)

Understand Your Attachment Style, Free 25-Question Relationship Test

Wondering what your attachment style is? Take the free Attachment Style test online — also called the attachment style quiz or attachment style assessment. Discover your attachment pattern, secure, anxious, avoidant, or fearful-avoidant, and how it shapes your relationships. 25 questions, instant results.

25 questions3 min
Take This Test
The basics

What is the Attachment Styles?

Attachment theory, originated by John Bowlby and empirically developed by Mary Ainsworth, describes how early bonds with caregivers create enduring patterns for how we relate to others throughout life. These patterns, called attachment styles, powerfully influence our behavior in romantic relationships, friendships, and even workplace dynamics.

Keep reading

Research has identified four adult attachment styles: Secure (comfortable with intimacy and interdependence), Anxious (preoccupied with relationship security), Avoidant (prioritizes self-sufficiency, uncomfortable with closeness), and Fearful-Avoidant (desires connection but fears it). Understanding your style is one of the most transformative insights you can gain about yourself.

JobCannon's 25-question Attachment Style test (also taken as an attachment style quiz) gives you a nuanced four-dimension profile, not just a single type label, so you can see where you land on each continuum and understand exactly how your attachment patterns affect your closest relationships and your path to more secure connection.

What you get

What You'll Discover

Your dominant attachment style and scores across all four dimensions
How your early bonding patterns show up in current relationships
Your relationship communication tendencies and emotional triggers
What secure attachment looks like for your specific style
Evidence-based practices to develop more secure attachment behaviors
How your style pairs with a partner's — and where common style mismatches create friction

You Might Also Like

Explore related assessments to deepen your self-understanding.

📚Scientific validation

Attachment Styles (Bowlby/Ainsworth-Inspired) is grounded in published psychometric research:

Attachment Styles (Bowlby/Ainsworth-Inspired)

JobCannon's Attachment Styles test is an original, 25-item, workplace-adapted questionnaire inspired by attachment theory (Bowlby, Ainsworth) — it does not administer the ECR, ECR-R, or ECR-Short Form (ECR-S), and none of those instruments' published reliability figures describe this test's own psychometrics.

Bowlby, J. (1958). Foundational attachment-theory paper on the infant-caregiver bond. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 350-373 source

Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Wittig, B. A. (1969). Developed the Strange Situation procedure and the secure / anxious-ambivalent / avoidant classifications this test's typology draws on; full account in Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters & Wall (1978), Patterns of Attachment. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), Determinants of Infant Behavior, Vol. 4, pp. 113-136, London: Methuen source

Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). For reference only, not administered by this test: the 12-item ECR Short Form (a real, separate self-report instrument) shows Anxiety α=.77-.86, Avoidance α=.78-.88; 1-month test-retest r=.80 (Anxiety) and .83 (Avoidance). Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 187-204 source

Warnock, K. N., Ju, C. S., & Katz, I. M. (2024). Meta-analysis (109 samples, N=32,278) found attachment style has incremental validity beyond the Big Five in predicting job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39, 1239-1257 source

  • Secure: comfortable with closeness and independence. Anxious (Preoccupied): fears abandonment, seeks constant reassurance. Avoidant (Dismissing): values independence, distances from emotional intimacy. Fearful-Avoidant (Disorganized): desires connection but fears vulnerability, often due to early inconsistent caregiving.

  • Yes. While attachment patterns form early, they are not fixed. Secure romantic partnerships, therapy (especially attachment-focused approaches), and increased self-awareness can move people toward more secure functioning over time. This test is often the first step.

  • Absolutely. Attachment patterns influence how you relate to managers, navigate team conflict, handle feedback, and respond to uncertainty. Anxious attachment can create dependency on validation; avoidant attachment can limit collaboration. Understanding your style improves professional relationships too.

  • The assessment is grounded in Bowlby-Ainsworth attachment theory and the four-category adult-attachment model of Bartholomew & Horowitz (1991), building on the romantic-attachment work of Hazan & Shaver (1987). It uses self-report methodology of the kind widely used in relationship and developmental psychology research.

  • About 3 minutes. There are 25 questions, each a short statement about how you feel and behave in close relationships, answered on an agree-to-disagree scale. There are no right or wrong answers — the most useful results come from answering honestly rather than how you'd like to be.

  • A profile. Instead of forcing you into one box, the result shows where you land on each of the four dimensions — secure, anxious, avoidant, and fearful — and names your dominant pattern. Most people show a primary style with a meaningful amount of one or two others, which is why a four-dimension view is more accurate than a single label.

  • Secure attachment tends to make close relationships feel easier, but the other styles aren't flaws or defects — each developed as a sensible way of coping with the relationships you grew up in. Your result names a current dominant strategy, not a fixed identity or a verdict on your worth as a partner.

  • Yes. Plenty of lasting relationships pair, for example, an anxious and an avoidant partner. Mismatches can create predictable friction — one person seeking reassurance while the other seeks space — but naming the pattern is what makes it workable. Awareness of both styles usually helps more than sharing the same one.

  • Avoidant (dismissing) people are generally comfortable being self-sufficient and tend to downplay the need for closeness. Fearful-avoidant (sometimes called disorganized) people genuinely want connection but also fear it, so they can swing between pulling someone close and pushing them away. The four-dimension result helps you see which pattern is stronger for you.

  • Many people find it useful. Taking it separately and then comparing results can turn a vague relationship tension into a concrete, non-blaming conversation — for example, recognizing that a need for reassurance and a need for space are both legitimate. The test is a starting point for that conversation, not a diagnosis of either person.

  • No. It's an educational self-report for self-reflection, not a clinical diagnostic, and it doesn't replace working with a therapist. If attachment patterns are causing real distress in your relationships, an attachment-focused therapist can go far deeper than any online test.

  • They're the same thing — people search for both the attachment style test and the attachment style quiz, and this free 25-question version is exactly what either name refers to. "Test" and "quiz" are used interchangeably here; whichever you searched for, you're in the right place, and the result is the same four-dimension attachment profile.

  • Answer the 25 questions above and you'll see your attachment profile right away — no signup. Each question places you on the secure–anxious–avoidant–fearful continuum, and the result shows where you land on all four dimensions rather than forcing you into one box. That's how you find out what your attachment style is, and you get practical notes on how it shapes your closest relationships and your path toward more secure connection.

Take the Attachment Style Test Now

Discover your Attachment Styles profile. 25 questions, 3 min.

Take This Test
For hiring teams

Not something to reject a candidate on

This measures something adverse rather than something the job needs. A rejection based on it is hard to defend the moment anyone asks to see the reasoning.

A relationship framework. It has no defensible reading in an employment decision.

Explore all results in depth

Already taken the test, or just curious? Read the in-depth guide for any result — strengths, challenges, career matches, famous people, and FAQs. See every result on one page.