JobCannon

: March 9, 2026

🎯

.

:

📊Why Science-Based Assessments Matter

r = 0.23

Big Five personality traits are the strongest predictor of job performance after cognitive ability (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998; Costa & McCrae, 1992).

70%

of career counselors worldwide use Holland's RIASEC model for career guidance, making it the most widely applied vocational framework (NCDA, 2024).

36.2M

Americans work remotely full-time. Matching personality to remote roles increases job satisfaction by 23% (Upwork, 2025; Buffer State of Remote Work).

🔬

  • •
  • •
  • •
  • •

  • •
  • •
  • •
  • •

  • •
  • •
  • •

  • •
  • •
  • •
  • •
  • •
  • •
  • •
  • •
  • •

📚

Big Five Personality (OCEAN)

Goldberg, L. R. (1993). "The structure of phenotypic personality traits." American Psychologist, 48(1), 26-34.

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). Meta-analysis of 117 studies. Conscientiousness → job performance rho = .22. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.

Zell, E. et al. (2022). 54 meta-analyses, N=554,778. NEO-PI-R reliability: α = .86-.92, test-retest .66-.80.

Heritability: 40-60% (Jang et al., 1996). Replicated in 50+ countries.

Values Assessment (Schwartz)

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Circular motivational continuum validated in 82 countries.

Kristof-Brown et al. (2005). Person-Job fit → satisfaction rho = .56; Person-Org fit → commitment rho = .51.

PVQ-RR reliability: α = .76 (49 groups, N=53,472, 32 languages).

Energy & Flow (Chronotype + Flow)

Horne & Ostberg (1976). MEQ reliability: α = .83, test-retest r = .87.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Flow Theory. Harris (2021): Flow → performance r = .53.

Chronotype heritability: 40-54%, 351 GWAS loci identified (PER2, PER3, CRY1).

EQ Dashboard (Emotional Intelligence)

Salovey & Mayer (1990). O'Boyle et al. (2011): EI → job performance rho = .24-.30, incremental over IQ + Big Five.

Mattingly & Kraiger (2019): EI IS trainable — 58 studies, moderate positive effect.

MacCann et al. (2020): EI = 3rd strongest predictor of academic performance (after IQ and Conscientiousness).

Attachment Styles (Bowlby/Ainsworth)

Bowlby, J. (1958). Ainsworth, M. (1960s). ECR-R reliability: α = .77-.88, test-retest r = .80-.83.

Warnock et al. (2024): 109 samples, N=32,278. Attachment predicts job performance with incremental validity beyond Big Five.

Conflict Styles (Thomas-Kilmann TKI)

Thomas, K. W. & Kilmann, R. H. (1974). 10M+ copies sold worldwide. Alpha = .60, test-retest .61-.68.

De Dreu & Weingart (2003): Both task AND relationship conflict → negative performance correlation.

Skills Audit (Competency Framework)

Schmidt & Hunter (1998): 85 years of research. Work samples r = .54, structured interviews r = .51.

Mabe & West (1982): Self-assessment validity r = .29. Best combined with 360° feedback.

RIASEC Career Archetypes (Holland)

Holland, J. L. (1959). O*NET standard. SDS reliability: α = .90-.94, test-retest .82-.96.

Nye et al. (2012): 60 years of research. Interest congruence → work performance r = .36.

🔓

  • ✓
  • ✓
  • ✓

  • ✗
  • ✗
  • ✗
  • ✗

🎯

Big Five Personality
Your personality blueprint — 5 dimensions that shape how you work and live.
Values Assessment
What matters most to you — the compass that guides career decisions.
Energy & Flow
When and how you do your best work — chronotype and flow triggers.
EQ Dashboard
Your emotional intelligence — how you read, feel, and respond.
Attachment Styles
How you form work relationships — trust, boundaries, and connection.
Conflict Styles
Your default approach to conflict and negotiation (Thomas-Kilmann).
Skills Audit
Map your skills across technical, tools, soft skills, and domain expertise.
RIASEC Career Archetypes
What careers match your interests — the Holland Code framework.