Articulation-aware Career Match. Transfer-readiness signal. Free for students.

Career Guide outputs include the typical four-year major route to that career and indicate which majors are common destinations from your community college. We map against publicly available articulation data (ASSIST in California, Transferology nationally, state-specific transfer-equivalency systems) to surface destinations where credits transfer cleanly. The student sees not just "Marketing Manager is a good match for you" but "the typical four-year route is a Marketing or Business Administration major; the in-state public universities your CC has articulation agreements with are X, Y, Z; transfer requirements include these prerequisite courses you have or have not completed". Advisors stop hand-rolling this conversation per student.

For California, AB 928 and the AB 1111 common course numbering work create a structured transfer readiness reporting expectation. JobCannon outputs student-level transfer-readiness data — assessment completion, Career Match alignment to identified four-year destination, prerequisite progress flag — that integrates into Cal-PASS Plus and Student Success Metrics frameworks. We do not directly file in CCCApply or CCCCO data systems; we provide the student-readiness file your district uses in its data submission. For non-California systems (Florida 2+2, Texas TCCNS, Arizona ATC, Washington DTA), parallel mappings supported.

Plenty of community college students start aiming at transfer and end up better-served by a CTE certificate or associate-degree-occupational route. The platform does not push transfer; it shows realistic pathways. A student whose Skills Audit favours kinesthetic and applied learning over academic abstraction sees CTE pathways prominently in their Career Guide output, with timeline and earning data alongside transfer routes. The conversation with their advisor moves from "transfer or not" to "which of these four pathways fits your goals and your context".

Yes. Advisors do not administer assessments; students take them on their own time during career-exploration weeks (often spring of the first year). Advisor dashboard surfaces three views: students with completed Career Match and identified transfer destination ready for advising appointment, students with completed assessments but no clear pathway needing exploratory conversation, and students who started but did not complete who need a nudge. A 400-student caseload becomes manageable when the dashboard prioritises which 30 students need a 1:1 this month.

Dual-enrolled high school students taking community college courses are tagged with both high school and CC cohort flags. They access the same assessments and Career Guide but Career Match weightings shift slightly toward in-state four-year destinations and CTE pathways the student can complete by age 19-20. Some districts pay for the platform under their CTE consortium budget; others pay under the community college budget; some split the cost. We can scope the deployment to either or both funding sources.

Tennessee Promise, California Promise Grant, Oregon Promise, and other free-community-college programmes typically include guided pathway components where Career Match and transfer-readiness data inform the structured pathway selection in semester one or two. The platform supports Promise-flagged cohorts with the same battery and adds an early-warning flag for students whose Career Match shows weak alignment to their declared pathway, prompting the advisor to surface alternatives before the student locks in.