Skip to main content

Built for state DOC education and Second Chance Pell sites

Career mapping for incarcerated learners. Realistic post-release pathways.

Closed-network kiosk, whitelisted-domain, or fully air-gapped deployment options. Education-staff-mediated assessment delivery. Privacy-first data posture for incarcerated populations.

In Brief

JobCannon for Correctional Education Re-entry serves state Department of Corrections education divisions, Second Chance Pell sites, and re-entry programmes operating inside correctional facilities. Three deployment patterns address restricted-internet environments: closed-network kiosk with daily sync via education-staff workstations, whitelisted-domain access for facilities with controlled internet, fully air-gapped offline mode with physical-media result sync. Education-staff-mediated assessment delivery supports trauma-informed approach. Career Match output is not gated by background-check requirements; education staff conduct the realistic-pathway conversation considering the participant\'s specific record, state ban-the-box landscape, and licensing-board policies. Sits at career-discovery layer underneath Second Chance Pell academic programmes. Release-readiness reporting via cohort exports to education-division data leads. Multi-facility deployment for DOC education divisions running across multiple sites under one master account. Default participant-controlled consent posture — incarcerated learners see what is collected and can request deletion; raw psychometric answers not surfaced to corrections officers or non-education staff. Aggregate state reentry council coordination supported under partnership engagement with appropriate data-sharing agreements. BJA Second Chance Act and similar federal grant programme reporting evidence. Participant access free; education-division dashboard runs on partnership tier scoped to facility network.

What correctional education divisions get

Restricted-network friendly, privacy-first, education-staff-mediated.

Three deployment patterns
Closed-network kiosk with daily sync, whitelisted-domain access, fully air-gapped offline mode with physical-media result sync. Operational complexity scales with facility security level.
Realistic post-release pathways
Career Match shows full match across 2,536 careers; education staff conduct realistic-pathway conversation with state-specific ban-the-box, fair-chance hiring, and licensing-board context. Conversation, not algorithmic gate.
Privacy-first data posture
Default participant-controlled consent. Education staff see archetype and Career Match summary; raw psychometric answers not surfaced to corrections officers. Data sharing with post-release providers requires participant consent.
Multi-facility deployment
State DOC education divisions running across multiple facilities deploy under one master account. Aggregate rolls up to division level; per-facility staff see only their site. Multi-tenant by architecture.

Education-staff-mediated battery

Strengths-led sequence, trauma-informed delivery.

Phase 2
Identity and fit
Phase 3 — release planning
Pathway commitment

Compared to corrections-education tooling

For a state DOC division running 12 facilities and 4,000 incarcerated learners

$120-260K/yr
Custom corrections-education platform build
Per-state consultancy
$70-150K/yr
Pearson VUE corrections licensing
Per-facility annual fee
$45-100K/yr
Edovo corrections education platform
Per-tablet content licensing
$0
JobCannon
Unlimited, forever

What correctional education divisions get

Free assessments for every incarcerated learner where deployment is supported
Closed-network kiosk, whitelisted-domain, or air-gapped deployment
Education-staff-mediated trauma-informed delivery
Realistic post-release pathway conversation tooling
Privacy-first data posture with consent-controlled sharing
Multi-facility deployment under DOC education-division master account
BJA Second Chance Act grant programme reporting evidence
Multi-agency reentry council coordination under partnership engagement

Correctional education pricing

Incarcerated learner access stays free where deployment is supported. Education-division dashboard runs on partnership tier scoped to facility network. Multi-state reentry council coordination supported under master partnership engagement.

Starter

Try it with a micro-team

$0
  • 5 invites (one-time, not recurring)
  • All 50+ assessments
  • Basic individual reports
  • Share link via email or Slack
  • No credit card required
Request free access

Coach

For independent coaches and therapists

$29/mo
or $290/yr (save 17%)
  • 30 invites per month
  • All 50+ assessments
  • Detailed individual reports
  • Coach notes per client
  • PDF export (client-ready)
  • Session prep recommendations
Get Coach access
Most Popular

Team

For startups, teams and HR

$79/mo
or $790/yr (save 17%)
  • 100 invites per month
  • Everything in Coach
  • Team DNA dashboard
  • Compatibility matrix
  • Conflict-pattern detection
  • Compare 2-3 team members
Get Team access

Business

For agencies, L&D and scale-ups

$199/mo
or $1990/yr (save 17%)
  • 500 invites per month
  • Everything in Team
  • White-label PDF reports (your logo)
  • API access (read-only results)
  • Custom assessment builder (beta)
  • Bulk CSV import/export
Get Business access
Recommended

Enterprise

For 200+ person companies

From $5k/yr
  • Unlimited invites
  • Everything in Business
  • SSO (SAML, Google Workspace)
  • SLA (99.9% uptime)
  • Data residency options (EU/US)
  • Dedicated Customer Success
Talk to us

All plans currently activated manually via the contact form — we review each request within 24 hours and provision access the same day. Self-serve checkout coming once we've heard from the first wave of teams.

Request a DOC pilot

Tell us your facility security profile, your network access posture, and your education programme mix. We respond with a deployment-pattern recommendation within three business days.

We reply within 24 hours. No spam, no per-seat pitches.

FAQ

How does this work in a facility with restricted internet access?

Three deployment patterns. (1) Closed-network kiosk — assessments run on facility computers connected to a private network with sync to JobCannon servers handled by approved education-staff workstations once daily. (2) Whitelisted-domain access — facilities with controlled internet access can whitelist the JobCannon domain for the education computer lab while restricting other network traffic. (3) Fully air-gapped — for facilities without any network access, an offline mode delivers assessments on standalone machines with results synced via approved physical media exchange when education staff have network access. The first two are operationally simpler; the third is rare but possible for high-security facilities.

How does this fit Second Chance Pell sites?

Second Chance Pell sites — postsecondary programmes operating in correctional facilities under the Pell experimental site initiative — typically deliver college coursework toward associate or bachelor's degrees. JobCannon serves these sites at the career-discovery layer underneath the academic programme. Incarcerated students take assessments inside the postsecondary programme curriculum (often in a career-services or first-year-experience component) and Career Match output informs major selection and post-release career planning. We do not deliver coursework or grant credit; we are the assessment-and-discovery layer.

How realistic should post-release Career Match output be given record-related restrictions?

The platform does not pretend a record does not affect the realistic pathway landscape, and it does not gate Career Match by background-check requirements either. Career Match shows the full match against the 2,536-career graph; education staff conduct the realistic-pathway conversation considering the participant's specific record, the state's ban-the-box and fair-chance hiring landscape, and licensing-board policies on consideration of past convictions. Many states have moved significantly on automatic-eligibility-restoration for licensure occupations (cosmetology, healthcare adjacent roles, CDL); the realistic landscape changes faster than career assessment platforms typically track.

How does this support release-readiness reporting to corrections leadership?

State Departments of Corrections education divisions and reentry coordinators expect data on programme completion and release-readiness indicators. The platform exports completion records, archetype distribution, Career Match alignment to identified post-release pathway, and skill-cluster baselines for cohort comparison across facilities. We do not file directly with state corrections data systems; we provide the structured cohort export the education-division data lead uses in internal reporting. State reentry councils tracking outcomes across multiple agencies (Corrections, Workforce, Vocational Rehabilitation) use the aggregate to inform interagency coordination.

What about deployment under DOJ Bureau of Justice Assistance grants?

BJA Second Chance Act grants, Justice Reinvestment Initiative work, and similar federal corrections-and-reentry funding streams typically expect outcomes data including educational programme completion and post-release placement. JobCannon contributes the assessment-evidence column. We do not satisfy any BJA framework end-to-end; we provide one piece of evidence in the broader programme reporting. State and local agencies running BJA-funded programmes typically pay for the platform under the grant's programme operations or technology line.

How do you handle data privacy for incarcerated populations?

Incarcerated populations have constitutional and statutory privacy protections that vary significantly by state. The platform deploys with default participant-controlled consent posture — incarcerated learners see what is collected and can request deletion. Education staff see archetype and Career Match summary; raw psychometric answers are not surfaced to corrections officers or non-education staff. Data shared with parole, probation, or post-release service providers requires participant consent through the existing release-planning process; we do not enable corrections-system-wide data sharing as a platform default.