Skip to main content

Built for youth justice re-entry programmes

Strengths-led, trauma-aware, employer-ready. Free for participants.

Multiple Intelligences and Skills Audit surface what participants already do well. Career Match emphasises reasonable-entry-point pathways. Transferable-skills statement participants can hand to second-chance employers.

In Brief

JobCannon for Youth Justice Re-entry Programmes serves justice-involved youth and young adults in re-entry, post-release, and diversion programmes. The platform deploys with strengths-led framing — Multiple Intelligences and Skills Audit surface what the participant already does well (often kinesthetic, interpersonal, naturalistic intelligences undervalued in school settings). Career Match output emphasises pathways with reasonable entry points and avoids credential-heavy paths participants cannot realistically reach in a 6-12 month re-entry timeline. Trauma-informed delivery model recommended: programme staff administer or sit alongside, battery sequencing starts strengths-led before personality instruments, result reveal is a coached conversation not self-served PDF. The platform does not collect criminal-history data and does not gate Career Match output by background-check requirements; programme staff handle eligibility-determination conversation. Outputs include a transferable-skills statement written in employer-facing language for use with second-chance employers. OJJDP Title II and Title V reporting supported via assessment-completion and Career Match alignment data feeding the employment-readiness column. Used alongside Roca, YouthBuild, Year Up Justice Initiative, Center for Employment Opportunities and similar national operators. Multi-site rollup for national operators on partnership tier. Free for participants; programme dashboard on Business tier or scoped under partnership.

What re-entry programmes get

Strengths-led, trauma-aware, second-chance-employer-ready.

Strengths-led battery
Multiple Intelligences and Skills Audit surface kinesthetic, interpersonal, naturalistic strengths often undervalued in school settings. Conversation moves from deficit framing to capability framing.
Reasonable-entry pathway focus
Career Match emphasises pathways with realistic 6-12 month entry points; avoids credential-heavy paths participants cannot reach in re-entry timeline. Programme staff handle pathways gated by licensure or background.
Employer-facing transferable-skills statement
Outputs include a participant-facing skill statement written in employer-facing language. Participants hand to second-chance employers in interviews. Programme staff coach use.
Trauma-informed delivery model
Recommended deployment pattern: staff-mediated administration, strengths-first sequencing, coached result-reveal conversation. Platform does not mandate but strongly recommends.

Strengths-led battery sequence

Strengths first, personality second, pathway third.

Week 1-2
Strengths surfacing
Week 3-4
Identity and fit
Week 5-6
Pathway and employer prep

Compared to re-entry programme tooling

For a national re-entry operator with 12 sites and 1,200 participants per year

$60-130K/yr
Custom case-management plus assessment build
Per-site consultancy
$35-80K/yr
Apricot Social Solutions plus assessments
Per-staff seat licensing
$25-55K/yr
Custom CRM build with assessment integration
Annual platform fee
$0
JobCannon
Unlimited, forever

What re-entry programmes get

Free assessments and Career Guide for every participant
Strengths-led Multiple Intelligences and Skills Audit
Reasonable-entry-point Career Match pathways
Employer-facing transferable-skills statement
Trauma-informed delivery model recommendations
OJJDP Title II and Title V reporting evidence
Multi-site rollup for national operators
No criminal-history data collection by platform

Re-entry programme pricing

Participant access stays free. Programme dashboard on Business tier ($199/mo flat) or scoped under partnership for national multi-site re-entry operators.

Starter

Try it with a micro-team

$0
  • 5 invites (one-time, not recurring)
  • All 50+ assessments
  • Basic individual reports
  • Share link via email or Slack
  • No credit card required
Request free access

Coach

For independent coaches and therapists

$29/mo
or $290/yr (save 17%)
  • 30 invites per month
  • All 50+ assessments
  • Detailed individual reports
  • Coach notes per client
  • PDF export (client-ready)
  • Session prep recommendations
Get Coach access
Most Popular

Team

For startups, teams and HR

$79/mo
or $790/yr (save 17%)
  • 100 invites per month
  • Everything in Coach
  • Team DNA dashboard
  • Compatibility matrix
  • Conflict-pattern detection
  • Compare 2-3 team members
Get Team access

Business

For agencies, L&D and scale-ups

$199/mo
or $1990/yr (save 17%)
  • 500 invites per month
  • Everything in Team
  • White-label PDF reports (your logo)
  • API access (read-only results)
  • Custom assessment builder (beta)
  • Bulk CSV import/export
Get Business access
Recommended

Enterprise

For 200+ person companies

From $5k/yr
  • Unlimited invites
  • Everything in Business
  • SSO (SAML, Google Workspace)
  • SLA (99.9% uptime)
  • Data residency options (EU/US)
  • Dedicated Customer Success
Talk to us

All plans currently activated manually via the contact form — we review each request within 24 hours and provision access the same day. Self-serve checkout coming once we've heard from the first wave of teams.

Request a re-entry pilot

Tell us your programme model, your site network, and your OJJDP or foundation funding. We respond with a partnership scope within three business days.

We reply within 24 hours. No spam, no per-seat pitches.

FAQ

Why does the assessment battery matter for justice-involved youth specifically?

Most career assessments were designed for high schoolers in stable settings, with the implicit assumption that the participant has cultural and material context for "what could I be when I grow up". Youth involved in the justice system often arrive with truncated career imagination — narrow exposure to occupations, complicated relationship to authority figures and credentialing systems, history of being told what they cannot do. The platform deploys with a strengths-led framing: Multiple Intelligences and Skills Audit surface what the participant already does well (often kinesthetic, interpersonal, naturalistic intelligences undervalued in school settings). Career Match output emphasises pathways with reasonable entry points and avoids credential-heavy paths the participant cannot realistically reach in a 6-12 month re-entry timeline.

How does the platform handle records-and-criminal-history considerations?

JobCannon does not collect criminal-history data and does not gate Career Match output by background-check requirements at the participant-facing layer. Programme staff can flag pathways requiring specific licensure (CDL, healthcare licensure, security-cleared roles) for participant-and-staff conversation, but we do not perform background-check filtering. The conversation about which paths are realistic given a record is a programme-staff conversation; we provide the assessment data, not the eligibility determination. Many states have ban-the-box and fair-chance hiring frameworks that change the realistic path landscape; programme staff stay current with state-specific opportunities and use the platform output as one input.

Does this fit OJJDP and Title II reporting?

OJJDP (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention) Title II Formula Grants and Title V Local Delinquency Prevention Grants typically require outcomes data on youth-served including educational and employment indicators. JobCannon contributes assessment-completion records and Career Match alignment data that feeds into the employment-readiness column of programme reports. We do not file OJJDP reports for you; we provide the assessment-evidence column in the reporting structure your programme already maintains.

What about trauma-informed considerations in assessment delivery?

Real concern, addressed by deployment design rather than by the platform itself. Three patterns. (1) Programme staff administer or sit with participant during assessment delivery rather than handing out a link and walking away. (2) Battery sequencing starts with strengths-led instruments (Multiple Intelligences, Values) before personality instruments (Big Five) — emotional regulation is fragile in early sessions. (3) Result reveal is a coached conversation, not a self-served PDF — programme staff frame the data as one piece of self-knowledge, not a verdict. The platform does not mandate this delivery model; we recommend it strongly to programmes serving justice-involved youth.

How does this work alongside Roca, Youth Build, and similar national programmes?

Complementary. National re-entry programme operators (Roca, YouthBuild, Year Up Justice Initiative, Center for Employment Opportunities) run intensive case-management and employment-prep programmes; JobCannon sits inside the curriculum as the assessment-and-discovery layer. National operators running multi-site programmes use the partnership tier for multi-site cohort rollup with site-level privacy. Cross-site comparison surfaces effective sites and informs technical-assistance prioritisation.

What about employer engagement on second-chance hiring?

The platform produces a transferable-skills statement participants can hand to employers — written in employer-facing language, focused on demonstrated skills not deficit framing, and grounded in assessment data not self-report alone. Programme staff coach participants on using the statement in interviews. We do not manage the employer relationship or run the second-chance hiring marketplace; we produce one tool participants and programme staff use in their own employer engagement. National second-chance employer networks (FWD.us business advisory council, Society for Human Resource Management Getting Talent Back to Work toolkit) provide the employer-side infrastructure.