Honest comparison
If you are outgrowing Hogan — typically because per-candidate cost stacks at hiring volume, you want SMB self-serve rather than enterprise + certified-consultant, or you want modern candidate UX alongside the assessment — here are four alternatives compared honestly. Important: JobCannon is NOT EEOC-validated; for legally-defensible selection, see the EEOC caveat in the FAQ.
Hogan is the gold standard for legally-defensible pre-employment selection — the HPI (personality), HDS (derailers), and MVPI (values) battery has 35+ years of EEOC-validated studies, court-tested adverse-impact analyses, and the deepest certified-consultant network in I-O psychology. Three structural reasons drive hiring teams to look for alternatives: per-candidate pricing that scales with hiring volume, an enterprise + certified-consultant model that does not fit SMB self-serve needs, and dated candidate UX. The four credible alternatives sit in different lanes. JobCannon ships 96 validated assessments at $199/mo flat for 200 candidates a month — strongest on cost structure, career-fit breadth, and modern UX (NOT EEOC-validated, see FAQ caveat). Predictive Index (enterprise plan, priced monthly) is the leadership and team-fit incumbent — strongest on the Behavioral Assessment (EEOC-validated) and team-dynamics workflow. Criteria Corp (SMB tier, priced annually) is the SMB self-serve EEOC-validated platform — strongest on the SMB-priced validated battery with cognitive testing. Caliper (enterprise quote) is the consulting-led psychometric platform — strongest on consultant-mediated selection and development workflows. Hogan still wins on EEOC defensibility, HDS derailers research, and certified-practitioner depth — high-stakes legally-defensible selection usually stays with Hogan while the broader career-fit and development layer unbundles elsewhere.
Where the gap between Hogan and the alternatives matters most.
What ships in each platform's standard hiring tier.
JobCannon Scale at $1,990/year flat versus per-candidate and enterprise alternatives. Each competitor below has a real strength — see the bullets section for where each platform wins.
Most hiring teams keep Hogan for the small number of high-stakes legally-defensible final-round selections and add JobCannon at $1,990/year for the broad career-fit signal across the full candidate pool plus development and onboarding work. The two platforms are not architecturally hostile — they serve different jobs at different points in the funnel.
For micro-teams trying the platform
For solo coaches and small HR
For startups, teams and HR
For agencies, L&D and scale-ups
For high-volume screening without a contract
For 200+ person companies
Self-serve checkout via Stripe — major cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Link. Cancel anytime; 14-day money-back on every paid plan. Enterprise via the contact form below.
Tell us your hiring volume, your current Hogan spend, and which layer (broad career-fit, legally-defensible selection, development) you want to move or unbundle. We respond with a switch plan and pricing comparison within three business days.
Three common reasons drive the search. (1) Per-candidate cost stacks at scale — Hogan is priced per-candidate per-assessment for the HPI (personality), HDS (derailers), and MVPI (values) battery, so the assessment line grows with hiring volume — a structural consideration for high-volume hiring (call centres, retail, frontline). (2) SMB self-serve — Hogan is enterprise-quoted and certified-consultant-mediated by default; small and mid-sized hiring teams that want a self-serve platform to drop into their ATS find the model heavyweight. (3) Modern hiring UX — candidate-facing experiences on Hogan are 1990s-validated batteries that work but feel dated next to newer platforms (JobCannon, Predictive Index, Criteria Corp). Hogan still wins on EEOC legal defensibility, 35+ years of validation studies, and the consulting depth that comes with the certified-practitioner network — high-stakes hiring decisions where legal defensibility is non-negotiable usually stay with Hogan.
JobCannon Scale tier is $199/mo flat ($1,990/year) for 200 candidates a month, with pricing that does not scale by headcount. Criteria Corp offers SMB tiers priced annually. Predictive Index prices enterprise plans monthly. Caliper is enterprise-quoted for full-battery deployment. For SMB and mid-market hiring teams running career-fit assessments rather than legally-defensible executive selection, JobCannon offers flat-rate pricing regardless of candidate volume.
No — and this is important enough to call out clearly. JobCannon is NOT EEOC-validated for pre-employment selection in the US. Our assessments are designed for career discovery, self-awareness, and team-fit reflection rather than legally-defensible hiring selection that survives Title VII adverse-impact challenges. If you are making high-stakes hiring decisions (executive selection, frontline at scale, regulated industries) where you need an assessment battery that has been validated against EEOC Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures and can survive court challenge, point your legal team to Hogan, Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment (the BA has more EEOC validation than the JA), Criteria Corp's validated battery, or Caliper — these are the platforms with the validation studies, adverse-impact analyses, and consulting depth to defend a hiring decision in court. JobCannon is appropriate as a career-fit signal alongside a structured interview, not as a sole or primary selection instrument.
Switching off Hogan entirely is rare for legally-defensible selection use cases because the EEOC validation studies and consulting depth are genuinely hard to replace. The more common pattern is unbundling: keeping Hogan for the high-stakes legally-defensible selection layer (executive selection, regulated-industry hires, adverse-impact-sensitive frontline at scale) while adding JobCannon (or another platform with broader assessment) for the career-fit, team-onboarding, and development layer. The development-and-coaching layer is portable; the legally-defensible selection layer is not. Most hiring teams run the hybrid for 12-18 months, then decide which layer goes where permanently.
Yes, and many mid-market and enterprise hiring teams do exactly that. The typical hybrid pattern is JobCannon for the broad career-fit signal across the candidate pool (146 tests, knowledge graph, skills-gap intervention loops) and Hogan for the legally-defensible final-round selection on high-stakes hires. The two layers do not compete — they serve different jobs at different points in the funnel. JobCannon is a wide-net career-fit and self-awareness signal; Hogan is a narrow, legally-validated selection battery for the small number of hires where the stakes justify the per-candidate cost.
Three areas worth being honest about. (1) EEOC legal defensibility — the HPI, HDS, and MVPI batteries have 35+ years of validation studies, adverse-impact analyses, and court-tested defensibility that no other platform on this comparison can match. For executive selection and regulated-industry hiring where the stakes justify the per-candidate cost, Hogan is genuinely irreplaceable. (2) Consulting depth and certified-practitioner network — Hogan deployments come with consultant interpretation, debrief sessions, and feedback workflows that drive real change in leadership-development contexts. (3) Derailers research — the HDS (Hogan Development Survey) is the most-cited dark-side personality measure in I-O psychology and is genuinely unique in its depth. For organisations where legally-defensible selection or executive-derailer measurement is the core need, Hogan stays in the stack and the broader career-fit layer can be unbundled elsewhere.