Honest comparison
Berke Assessment (now part of HighMatch) wins on a refined Job Fit Report, a customized Interview Guide, and enterprise consultant support built over years of hiring use. JobCannon wins on flat $199/mo pricing with no annual re-pricing, a live no-iframe REST API you embed in your own ATS, and an O*NET job-fit report that shows per-attribute optimal bands, a behavioral fit score, a cognitive/reasoning score, and tailored interview questions. Many teams pilot both.
JobCannon and Berke both score a candidate against a specific role and hand the hiring manager a fit read, but through different commercial and delivery models.
Pricing — Berke, like most legacy hiring-assessment vendors, prices on volume and commonly re-quotes each year based on prior-year usage, which is hard for a small team to budget. JobCannon Scale is $199/mo flat: 180 assessments included, then $2 each (~$1/assessment at committed volume), with no annual re-pricing.
The report — Berke's Job Fit Report shows each trait on a sliding scale against the role's target range, a low/medium/high match, and a mismatching-trait list, plus a per-candidate Interview Guide. JobCannon ships the equivalent via API: per-attribute optimal band (from O*NET Work Styles) with the candidate's marker, a behavioral fit score, an optional cognitive/reasoning score weighted by role complexity, and behavioral interview questions keyed to where the candidate deviates.
Integration — Berke is typically delivered inside its own platform or via consultant workflow. JobCannon exposes a no-iframe REST API (X-API-Key: start → serve questions → score), so the candidate never leaves your ATS and you render the report in your own UI.
Berke's clear wins are report maturity, the certified-consultant ecosystem, and years of hiring-specific validation. JobCannon's clear wins are flat pricing, the live embeddable API, the O*NET job-fit report at parity, and a closed skills-gap→free-course loop no hiring vendor offers.
Where the platforms diverge for hiring teams.
What each platform brings to a hiring decision.
For a team running steady hiring volume
Live on the Scale tier ($199/mo) with a monthly assessment allotment; additional assessments are $2 each — roughly $1/assessment at committed volume, with no annual re-pricing on prior-year usage.
Always free for micro-teams
For solo coaches and small HR
For startups, teams and HR
For agencies, L&D and scale-ups
For 200+ person companies
Self-serve checkout via Stripe — major cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Link. Cancel anytime; 14-day money-back on Starter, Team, and Scale. Enterprise via the contact form below.
Tell us your ATS and expected hiring volume. We respond with a 14-day sandbox key and the endpoint reference for the assessment + job-fit report.
Yes. JobCannon's job-fit endpoint scores a candidate's Big Five against a specific O*NET occupation and returns, per attribute, the role's optimal band (derived from O*NET Work Styles) with the candidate's marker, an in-zone / near / off verdict, a composite behavioral fit score, an optional cognitive/reasoning score weighted by role complexity, a mismatching-trait list, and behavioral interview questions keyed to where the candidate deviates — the same shape as Berke's Job Fit Report plus Interview Guide. The difference is delivery: JobCannon returns it as JSON over a REST API so you render it inside your own ATS.
JobCannon Scale is $199/mo flat — 180 assessments included, then $2 each, which works out to roughly $1/assessment at committed volume. There is no annual re-pricing. Berke, like most legacy hiring-assessment vendors, prices on volume and commonly re-quotes each year based on the prior year's usage; several buyers have told us that yearly re-negotiation is exactly what makes a small team's budget hard to plan. For steady hiring volume, flat pricing pulls structurally ahead.
Honestly, a few things. Berke's Job Fit Report and Interview Guide have been refined over years of hiring-specific use, it carries established validation for selection, and — now under HighMatch — it comes with enterprise support and a certified-consultant ecosystem that can deliver assessment as part of a larger talent engagement. If you want a mature, consultant-delivered hiring product with a long validation track record, that is a real asset.
Yes — that is the design. JobCannon exposes a REST API (X-API-Key): you start an assessment, serve the returned questions inside your own UI, submit the answers, and get scores back, then call the job-fit endpoint for the report. The candidate never leaves your platform and there is no iframe, so there are no third-party-cookie or Safari security-frame issues.
Yes, optionally. Berke measures 7 personality traits plus 4 cognitive abilities. JobCannon returns a behavioral fit score from Big Five and, when you also run an aptitude test (IQ, critical thinking, numerical reasoning), blends a cognitive/reasoning score into an overall fit — weighted more heavily for complex roles, following the same principle Wonderlic uses.
Yes. Some teams keep Berke for engagements where the consultant-delivered report and its validation history are the deliverable, and add JobCannon for high-volume roles where flat pricing and a no-iframe API embedded in the ATS matter more. The two layer rather than overlap.