From 50 to 50,000 participants
Multi-tier dashboards, cohort comparison, intervention flagging, journey views. Built for districts, workforce boards, NGO networks, and multi-site coaching practices.
JobCannon Cohort Management is the operations layer for organisations running assessment delivery as a recurring programme. Five capabilities ship by default: cohort creation (group by class, programme, intake, year, school site, funding source), assessment assignment (push specific assessments to specific cohorts on a schedule), per-cohort dashboards (real-time completion, archetype, skill-gap, Career Match cluster), cohort comparison (year-over-year, school-to-school, programme-to-programme), and intervention flagging (stalled participants, engagement decline, low programme fit). Multi-tier dashboards on partnership engagements: case manager → supervisor → board level, each with appropriate scope. Supports 50 to 50,000 active participants across single or multi-site deployments. Concurrent overlapping cohorts (fall, spring, summer simultaneously) are first-class. Archived cohorts retain data for longitudinal year-over-year analysis. Used by school districts, workforce boards (WIOA, TAA), NGO networks, and franchise coaching practices.
Cohort delivery as a system, not a stack of one-offs.
Push the right assessment at the right cohort lifecycle stage.
For an organisation managing 5,000 active participants
Cohort management sits next to the institutional dashboard on the B2B hub — the dashboard rolls cohort outcomes up to programme and organisation level, while bulk CSV and class-code onboarding populates each cohort in a single upload.
District-scale deployments for school districts use cohorts to separate building-level data, while vocational and trade schools use them to track CTE concentrators across programmes-of-study; the CTE concentrator reporting guide explains how cohort tagging feeds Perkins V indicators.
Single-cohort dashboards from Team tier ($79/mo, up to 100 active participants per month). Multi-cohort comparison and intervention flagging from Business tier ($199/mo flat). Multi-tier dashboards (case manager → supervisor → board) under partnership engagements.
Try it with a micro-team
For independent coaches and therapists
For startups, teams and HR
For agencies, L&D and scale-ups
For 200+ person companies
All plans currently activated manually via the contact form — we review each request within 24 hours and provision access the same day. Self-serve checkout coming once we've heard from the first wave of teams.
Tell us how many cohorts you run, your participant counts, and your reporting needs. We respond with a fit assessment within one business day.
Five capabilities. (1) Cohort creation — group participants by class, programme, intake, year, school site, or funding source. (2) Assignment — push specific assessments to specific cohorts at specific times. (3) Dashboards — see real-time completion, archetype distribution, skill-gap patterns, and Career Match clusters per cohort. (4) Comparison — view multiple cohorts side by side (year-over-year, school-to-school, programme-to-programme). (5) Intervention flags — surface participants who started but stalled, who completed but show low engagement, or who match a low-fit profile for their programme. The point is to manage assessment delivery as a programme, not as individual transactions.
Three roles by default, all configurable. Case manager (or teacher, mentor, programme officer) sees their personal caseload — the participants they are responsible for. Supervisor (or principal, programme director, regional manager) sees all the case managers under them and can drill into any caseload. Board level (or district administrator, executive director, federal grant officer) sees aggregate analytics across the whole organisation with drill-down. Each tier has the right level of detail; case managers see individual journeys, supervisors see manager performance, board sees institutional outcomes. Available on partnership engagements with role configuration set up during onboarding.
Yes. Three default flags ship in cohort management. (1) Stalled participants — started the assessment battery but have not progressed in seven days. (2) Engagement decline — completed early assessments but skipped recent ones. (3) Low programme fit — assessment results indicate the participant matches a different programme than the one they enrolled in. Flags are passive — they appear in a coordinator’s queue, they do not auto-email participants. Coordinators decide whether to reach out. Most adopting institutions report 60-75 percent of flagged participants respond positively to a personal touch within a week.
Side-by-side metrics across any two cohorts you select. Most-used comparisons are year-over-year (2025 cohort vs 2026 cohort to track programme evolution), school-to-school (which school in the district produces stronger archetype distribution), and programme-to-programme (which intake track produces stronger career-match clarity). Comparisons cover archetype distribution, skill-gap heatmap density, Career Match clustering tightness, and completion rates. Programme directors use these for impact reporting; admissions teams use them to refine intake.
The platform serves cohorts from 50 to 50,000 participants across single or multi-site deployments. Multi-site deployments are common for school districts (12-50 schools), workforce boards (10-30 American Job Centers), and franchise coaching networks (5-20 affiliate sites). Each site gets its own dashboard scope; a regional director or district administrator sees all sites in one comparison view. Multi-site role configuration runs under partnership engagements.
Yes. Most institutions run overlapping cohorts — a fall intake, a spring intake, a summer intake, with different cohorts at different lifecycle stages at any given time. The dashboard groups cohorts by status (active, mid-programme, post-completion, archived). You can run reporting on any cohort or combination of cohorts at any time without affecting the others. Archived cohorts retain data for longitudinal analysis (year-over-year comparison, alumni outcome mapping) without counting against active-participant limits.