Michigan career standards crosswalk
Michigan Career Development Targets (Michigan Department of Education (Michigan Career Development Model) and the Michigan Legislature (Revised School Code, Act 451 of 1976)) covers grades 6-8 in 2 groups and 9 criteria. 2 are evidenced directly by something the platform produces, 4 more are supported by a named result plus teacher-led classroom work, and we make no claim on the other 3. The two claimed groups are never added into one number.
Michigan compels a middle-grades career plan by law. Michigan compels this twice over, from two different directions, and both are worth quoting because a district will be asked about both. The curriculum duty is MCL 380.1166a, the Brian Whiston career pathways law: "Beginning in the 2019-2020 school year, the board of a school district or board of directors of a public school academy shall ensure that the school district's or public school academy's curriculum incorporates grade-appropriate instruction on career development in each grade level in grades K to 12." The same section is what produced the model this page tables — it directed the department to "develop or adopt, and make available to schools, a model program of instruction in career development" that "Defines learning targets and themes for each grade level", which is what the Michigan Career Development Model and its targets are. The document duty is MCL 380.1278b(11): "The board of a school district or board of directors of a public school academy shall provide the opportunity for each pupil to develop an educational development plan during grade 7, and shall ensure that each pupil reviews his or her educational development plan during grade 8 and revises it as appropriate before he or she begins high school." Two constraints in that same subsection bear directly on what a vendor can and cannot close. The plan "must be developed, reviewed, and revised by the pupil under the supervision of the pupil's school counselor or another designee qualified to act in a counseling role under section 1233 or 1233a selected by the school principal" — so the supervision is a named, certificated human by statute, not a workflow. And it "must be based on high school readiness scores and a career pathways program or similar career exploration program", which is the opening a career-exploration platform fills: we can be that programme, we cannot be that counsellor.
The standard itself: Michigan Career Development Targets, published by Michigan Department of Education (Michigan Career Development Model) and the Michigan Legislature (Revised School Code, Act 451 of 1976), grades 6-8. Two groups because there are two instruments. "MCDM-MS" holds the six Michigan Career Development Model targets for the middle-school band, each with the state's own number and its own short name — Career Clusters, Academic Connections, Career Exploration, Family Engagement, Career Interests, Career Planning. "1278b(11)" holds the three lettered paragraphs of the EDP statute, (a) through (c). We stop the second group at the three letters rather than decomposing the long lead sentence of subsection (11) into criteria of our own: the lead sentence carries real duties — grade 7 development, grade 8 review, counsellor supervision, a basis in readiness scores and a career exploration programme — but the state numbers none of them, and inventing six sub-codes for one paragraph would put our structure on a page that claims to show Michigan's. Those duties are quoted in full above instead.
Below is every one of its 9 criteria, what closes each, and what a student walks away with — 2 evidenced directly, 4 supported via lesson plan, 3 not claimed. The 2 directly-evidenced criteria and the 4 lesson-supported ones stay separate on purpose — merging them into one headline would flatter the platform at your expense.
Every criterion, what closes it, and what a student walks away with.
Michigan Department of Education (Michigan Career Development Model) and the Michigan Legislature (Revised School Code, Act 451 of 1976) — www.michigan.gov/mde/-/media/Project/Websites/mde/CTE/career-development/MCDM/MCDM-Targets.pdf
The two claimed counts stay separate on purpose — merging platform-evidenced and teacher-supported criteria into one number would flatter the platform at your expense.
Both halves of the code column are the state's own numbering, and both can be cited back. "MCDM-MS Target 1" is the Michigan Career Development Model's own label for the first middle-school target, and "1278b(11)(a)" is the statutory paragraph exactly as the Revised School Code prints it. The one thing that is ours is the group prefix "MCDM-MS": the targets document numbers its targets 1 to 6 within each band and restarts the numbering in the next band, so "Target 1" alone is ambiguous across the five bands and we prefix it with the band to make it quotable.
Career Clusters: Introduce the 17 Michigan career clusters to students and families.
No JobCannon surface addresses this criterion. We are not naming a workaround for it.
A near miss a reviewer will find, so we name it rather than let them find it as a surprise. Our careers corpus is organised by cluster and 2,652 of its 2,749 careers carry at least one — but there are 14 of them (Advanced Manufacturing, Agriculture, Arts, Entertainment & Design, Construction, Digital Technology, Education, Energy & Natural Resources, Financial Services, Healthcare & Human Services, Hospitality, Events & Tourism, Management & Entrepreneurship, Marketing & Sales, Public Service & Safety, Supply Chain & Transportation), measured 2026-09-06, and they are not Michigan's 17. A criterion whose whole content is a specific state taxonomy is not met by a different taxonomy of a different size, however good the underlying data. The second half of the criterion is missing outright: "and families" has no surface in the product at all — there is no parent view, no family login and nothing addressed to a parent.
Academic Connections: Connect academic content in all classes to the Michigan career clusters and embed across curriculum.
No JobCannon surface addresses this criterion. We are not naming a workaround for it.
The subject of this target is the district's own curriculum in every classroom. It asks that what is taught in mathematics, science and English be connected to career clusters and that the connection be embedded rather than bolted on. We do not hold what any class is teaching, we have no grade-level or subject-level organisation of any kind, and no software purchase makes an embedded curriculum exist. This is a flat no.
Career Exploration: Acquire career, postsecondary, and employment knowledge.
/careers/search over the full corpus, the individual career profiles it opens, the education tier on each of them, and /careers/no-degree-required for the postsecondary half
A filtered, browsable set of career profiles carrying median wage, education tier and cluster, assignable to a student
Two of the three kinds of knowledge this target names are well covered and the third is not, so a district should size it accordingly. Career knowledge: 2,749 profiles. Postsecondary: 1,020 of those carry an education tier, measured 2026-09-06, and the rest are blank. Employment knowledge is the weak one — a BLS median wage resolves on 2,715 careers and 34 have none, and we carry nothing else about the labour market: no job openings, no growth rate, no outlook, no projection, and nothing specific to Michigan. Michigan's own definition of employment knowledge is in the statute below at 1278b(11)(a), and it is exactly the part we do not have. The teacher or counsellor closes that half from a state labour-market source.
Family Engagement: Provide family engagement opportunities to support career exploration.
No JobCannon surface addresses this criterion. We are not naming a workaround for it.
There is no family-facing surface in JobCannon. A parent cannot log in, cannot be sent a result, and is not a role the product models. Michigan threads family engagement through all five bands of the model — it is a target at every level, early childhood through postsecondary — so a district reading this page should expect to meet it entirely outside whatever platform it buys.
Career Interests: Use inventories to generate self-awareness and identify personal motivations related to work, income, and lifestyle.
/assessments/riasec, /assessments/career-match and /assessments/onet-interest-profiler for the interest inventories, and /assessments/values for motivations
A scored interest profile and a scored values profile per student, held against that student and exportable
Direct because the target says "inventories" and that is precisely what this is — the platform administers them, scores them and returns a self-awareness profile with no teacher step in the middle. All three interest inventories are assignable from the school dashboard, and Values is PVQ-21, a published instrument measuring what a person prioritises, which is the "personal motivations" half. The honest limit is the word income: motivations about income are measured only indirectly, through the wage figures on the careers a result points at, not as a scale of their own.
Career Planning: Initiate an Educational Development Plan (EDP) and provide orientation to the purpose of the Talent Portfolio; review and revise each year.
/assessments/riasec and /assessments/career-match for the interest basis the statute requires an EDP to rest on, /assessments/skills-audit for strengths, and the education tier on career pages for the academic requirements the plan has to connect to
The interest, strengths and education-pathway inputs an EDP is built from, held per student
We supply what goes into the plan and none of the plan. Michigan is more prescriptive here than most states and the constraints are statutory rather than cultural: the EDP must be developed under the supervision of the pupil's school counsellor or another designee qualified to act in a counselling role, it must be reviewed and revised every year through high school, and it must be based on high school readiness scores as well as a career exploration programme. We hold no readiness scores, we are not a counsellor, and we do not store a plan document. The Talent Portfolio half is further out still — it is a multi-year record of experiences, certifications and accomplishments, and we have no surface for any of the three.
Information on various types of careers and current and projected job openings in this state and those jobs' actual and projected wages.
/careers/search and the individual career profiles, each carrying a BLS median wage
A browsable set of 2,749 career profiles, 2,715 of them carrying a median wage
This paragraph has four requirements and we meet one and a half of them, so the district should plan to source the rest. "Various types of careers": yes, 2,749 of them. "Actual wages": a BLS median on 2,715 of the 2,749, measured 2026-09-06, with 34 carrying none — and national, not Michigan. "Current and projected job openings in this state": no. Our corpus has no openings field, no vacancy data and no state dimension whatsoever. "Projected wages": no. There is no time dimension in the data at all — no growth rate, no forecast, nothing dated forward. The missing half is not teacher work in the usual sense; it is a different data source, and Michigan publishes it. A counsellor should bring state labour-market information to this conversation and treat our profiles as the career-and-wage side of it.
An opportunity to explore careers specific to a pupil's interests and identify career pathways and goals for achieving success in those careers, including, but not limited to, the level and type of educational preparation necessary to accomplish those goals.
/assessments/riasec, /assessments/career-match and /assessments/onet-interest-profiler, the career matches each result opens into, and the education tier carried on those career pages
A scored interest profile resolving to named careers, each showing the level of education it requires
Direct because the paragraph asks for an opportunity, and the opportunity is what the platform produces on its own: the pupil answers, the result names careers specific to their interests, and each of those careers states the educational preparation it takes. The statute's own "including, but not limited to" clause — level and type of educational preparation — is the part we serve best, and it is worth noting the coverage: 1,020 of 2,749 careers carry an education tier, so a pupil whose matches fall outside that set will see the career and not the preparation. The half that stays with the counsellor is goals. Identifying a goal is a decision a pupil makes with an adult and records in the EDP; we supply the material it is made from.
An opportunity to develop a talent portfolio. A talent portfolio must be developed and revised throughout the implementation of a pupil's educational development plan. A talent portfolio must include, but is not limited to, a record of the pupil's experiences, proficiencies, certifications, or accomplishments that demonstrate talents or marketable skills.
The per-student assessment record at /business/dashboard/invites, which holds each completed result against the pupil it was assigned to
A dated record of which assessments a pupil completed and what they scored, exportable by the school
Michigan lists four things a talent portfolio must record and we produce one of them. Proficiencies: a scored profile is a defensible record of one. Experiences, certifications and accomplishments: none of the three is produced by the product — we do not issue certificates and we do not log activities. One near miss belongs here rather than in a reviewer's hands: we do have a live resume surface, where a user uploads an existing resume and we rewrite it against a target role. It does not close this paragraph. It compiles nothing from a pupil's record, it carries no field for certifications or accomplishments, and it sits on the consumer career-guide track behind a personal login rather than on the school dashboard, so a Michigan district cannot assign it, collect it, or attach it to an Educational Development Plan. Two further limits are structural rather than missing features. The portfolio must be revised throughout the EDP's implementation, which is years, and nothing in our record transfers with a pupil to another school. And the portfolio belongs to the pupil; our record belongs to the school's account.
Four rules, applied to every one of Michigan's 9 criteria.
Grouped by the criteria each one actually closes — read from the rows, not chosen for the page.
Two district contracts as published in board papers — one covering a single school year, one a five-year agreement — beside our per-student rate for one academic year
This is Michigan's page in a set of state career-standards crosswalks built the same way — every criterion of a state's own document, matched one at a time, with what we do not claim listed as plainly as what we do. The most detailed of them is Arizona's grades 6-8 eCTE crosswalk, which carries a per-row evidence trail and four documented revision passes. The others: Texas, California, Utah, Illinois, Colorado, Georgia, Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York and Washington.
A career-standards document is not the same thing as a plan-completion mandate — for whether Michigan compels an individual student plan, and under which statute, see our career and education plan mandate directory. For the wider grades 6-8 deployment this crosswalk sits inside, see JobCannon for Middle Schools, or career assessments for school districts for a multi-school rollout. Both are part of the JobCannon for Business hub.
Scale is $199/mo and covers 200 people per billing period — the same unit as any school or district deployment. Where the crosswalk above is the evidentiary piece a procurement review needs, the Education Licence below prices your whole grade band per student for the year, assessments uncapped.
For micro-teams trying the platform
For solo coaches and small HR
For startups, teams and HR
For agencies, L&D and scale-ups
For high-volume screening without a contract
For 200+ person companies
Self-serve checkout via Stripe — major cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Link. Cancel anytime; 14-day money-back on every paid plan. Enterprise via the contact form below.
One rate per enrolled student for the academic year, sized for Michigan district or school-level rollouts. Assessments uncapped, career and skills corpus included — multiply your own enrolment by the band and that is the price, before you talk to us.
$3.00 down to $2.00 per student, per year — assessments uncapped
Per head this is more than our monthly hiring plans, and deliberately so — it is a different licence, not a bigger size of the same one. Those plans meter individual candidates for hiring and coaching. This covers your enrolled roll for the academic year with assessments uncapped, retakes included, the career and skills corpus licensed with it and the cohort dashboard in the price. Which one is yours is decided by use, not by whichever number is smaller.
A large school, multi-school district or trust
A university, college or college group
A statewide or national programme
£350 per school, per year — a flat whole-school licence rather than a per-student rate, because that is the unit UK schools budget in. Same uncapped assessments and same corpus. Excludes VAT.
The ladder starts at 1,301 students. Below that there is no licence to quote: a roll that small is better served by a self-serve plan, and that is the one case where a plan covers a school’s own students — UK schools have the flat whole-school licence at any size. Bands are by enrolment, and the rate applies to your whole roll rather than to a seat count you have to predict. Invoiced annually against a purchase order; no per-assessment charge and nothing to top up mid-year. Assessing an institution's enrolled students is covered by the Education Licence, not by a hiring plan. What is in the corpus.
Tell us your school or district size and which grade band you're evaluating against. We reply with this crosswalk in your procurement format and a pilot plan within two business days.
Michigan compels a middle-grades career plan by law. Michigan compels this twice over, from two different directions, and both are worth quoting because a district will be asked about both. The curriculum duty is MCL 380.1166a, the Brian Whiston career pathways law: "Beginning in the 2019-2020 school year, the board of a school district or board of directors of a public school academy shall ensure that the school district's or public school academy's curriculum incorporates grade-appropriate instruction on career development in each grade level in grades K to 12." The same section is what produced the model this page tables — it directed the department to "develop or adopt, and make available to schools, a model program of instruction in career development" that "Defines learning targets and themes for each grade level", which is what the Michigan Career Development Model and its targets are. The document duty is MCL 380.1278b(11): "The board of a school district or board of directors of a public school academy shall provide the opportunity for each pupil to develop an educational development plan during grade 7, and shall ensure that each pupil reviews his or her educational development plan during grade 8 and revises it as appropriate before he or she begins high school." Two constraints in that same subsection bear directly on what a vendor can and cannot close. The plan "must be developed, reviewed, and revised by the pupil under the supervision of the pupil's school counselor or another designee qualified to act in a counseling role under section 1233 or 1233a selected by the school principal" — so the supervision is a named, certificated human by statute, not a workflow. And it "must be based on high school readiness scores and a career pathways program or similar career exploration program", which is the opening a career-exploration platform fills: we can be that programme, we cannot be that counsellor.
Michigan Career Development Targets — the "Middle School – Career Exploration" band, marked ⚖ Legislatively Required, together with the three things MCL 380.1278b(11) requires a pupil be provided while their Educational Development Plan is developed and reviewed., published by Michigan Department of Education (Michigan Career Development Model) and the Michigan Legislature (Revised School Code, Act 451 of 1976), grades 6-8. Michigan is the only state on this list whose middle-school obligation is split across two documents, and reading either one alone gives the wrong answer. The Michigan Career Development Model sets six targets for the middle-school band and marks that whole band ⚖ Legislatively Required — but the targets are programme outcomes written for a district, not criteria written for a student. The specifics sit in statute: MCL 380.1278b(11) is the Educational Development Plan provision, it lands in grades 7 and 8, and it enumerates three things a pupil must be provided while the plan is developed and reviewed. We table both, in two groups, nine criteria in total. What we deliberately do not table is the rest of §1278b, which is the Michigan Merit Curriculum — credit requirements for high school graduation, nothing to do with a middle-school career programme. The second source is at legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=mcl-380-1278b. Two groups because there are two instruments. "MCDM-MS" holds the six Michigan Career Development Model targets for the middle-school band, each with the state's own number and its own short name — Career Clusters, Academic Connections, Career Exploration, Family Engagement, Career Interests, Career Planning. "1278b(11)" holds the three lettered paragraphs of the EDP statute, (a) through (c). We stop the second group at the three letters rather than decomposing the long lead sentence of subsection (11) into criteria of our own: the lead sentence carries real duties — grade 7 development, grade 8 review, counsellor supervision, a basis in readiness scores and a career exploration programme — but the state numbers none of them, and inventing six sub-codes for one paragraph would put our structure on a page that claims to show Michigan's. Those duties are quoted in full above instead.
It means the platform itself produces the artefact the criterion asks for, with nothing a teacher has to add. 2 criteria of the 9 are closed this way: MCDM-MS Target 5 and 1278b(11)(b). Each of those rows names the surface and the artefact, and several carry a coverage caveat — how many careers actually hold the field being claimed — because a reviewer will check.
It means the platform supplies the data or the assessment result and a teacher runs the classroom half — it is weaker, and it is labelled separately for that reason. 4 criteria are closed this way: MCDM-MS Target 3, MCDM-MS Target 6, 1278b(11)(a) and 1278b(11)(c). A plan a system wrote for the student would not satisfy the standard, and claiming it would not be worth much either.
Because the 2 and the 4 are different kinds of evidence — one is work the software does on its own, the other is work a teacher does with something the software supplies — and merging them into one headline number would flatter the platform at your expense. Every row states which of the two it is, and the counts are shown as separate pills rather than added together.
We make no claim on them. No JobCannon surface — assessment, career-page field or glossary entry — addresses them, and they are listed exactly as plainly as the 6 we do claim: same row format, same visual weight, a stated "not claimed" rather than an absence.
Both halves of the code column are the state's own numbering, and both can be cited back. "MCDM-MS Target 1" is the Michigan Career Development Model's own label for the first middle-school target, and "1278b(11)(a)" is the statutory paragraph exactly as the Revised School Code prints it. The one thing that is ours is the group prefix "MCDM-MS": the targets document numbers its targets 1 to 6 within each band and restarts the numbering in the next band, so "Target 1" alone is ambiguous across the five bands and we prefix it with the band to make it quotable.
The Michigan Career Development Targets PDF read 2026-09-06, published 18 December 2024 per the document's own timestamp; MCL 380.1166a as added by 2018 PA 229, effective 25 September 2018; MCL 380.1278b as last amended by 2022 PA 105, effective 29 March 2023. One access note that matters for anyone re-checking this page: michigan.gov and legislature.mi.gov both sit behind a web application firewall that returns 403 to a plain command-line fetch. That is a perimeter block on the tool, not a dead link — both documents load normally in a browser, and we read them through a read-through proxy to confirm the text quoted here. The document itself is linked at the top of the table, so you can check any row against the source rather than take our word for it.
Tell us your school or district size and which grade band you're evaluating against. We reply with this crosswalk in your procurement format and a pilot plan within two business days.