A steady-commitment score means satisfaction, closed-off alternatives and investment are each landing in a moderate-to-solid range, with no single base dragging the total down and none propping it up artificially.
In Rusbult's investment model this is the profile most consistent with an ordinary, functioning relationship — not without friction, but not running on a single overworked input either. It's a reasonable baseline rather than a ceiling: the subscale breakdown shows which of the three bases has the most room to grow, which is more useful than treating the combined number as a finished verdict.
Strengths
- No single base is doing all the work — the score isn't propped up by one factor alone
- A workable baseline that most functioning relationships sit near, not an outlier in either direction
- Enough investment and closed-off alternatives to weather an ordinary rough patch
- Room to identify which one base, if strengthened, would move the whole profile up
Growth Edges
- Easy to read "steady" as "finished" and stop paying attention to any one base
- A moderate satisfaction bar inside a steady total can still mean real unmet needs day to day
- Steady is a snapshot — Rusbult's longitudinal data shows all three bases move over time, not just at the extremes
Read More
- What Is the Investment Model of Commitment?
- How to Read Your Relationship Commitment Score
- What Counts as "Investment" in a Relationship?
- Signs You're Coasting vs. Signs You're Genuinely Committed
- The History of Commitment Research, From Rusbult to Today
- Rusbult's Investment Model vs. Sternberg's Triangular Theory of Love
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a steady commitment score good?
It's a workable, ordinary profile — satisfaction, alternatives and investment are each in a reasonable range rather than any one of them carrying the total alone. It isn't a ceiling and it isn't a warning; it's closer to a baseline most functioning relationships sit near at any given time.
Should I try to move from steady to anchored?
Only if one specific base actually feels under-built to you — the subscale breakdown shows which. Chasing a higher combined number for its own sake misses the point of the model; Rusbult's research treats the three bases as things that grow naturally through shared time, not targets to optimise directly.
Does a steady score mean the relationship has no problems?
No — a moderate satisfaction bar can sit inside a steady total while real day-to-day needs go unmet, offset by solid investment or closed-off alternatives. The combined score describes the balance of the three forces, not the absence of friction.
How often should I retake this test?
Every few months, or after a significant change — a move, a new job, a stretch of conflict or unusual closeness. Rusbult's original study tracked couples monthly and found real movement in the underlying bases over time, so a single snapshot is a starting point, not a fixed label.
What's the difference between this and Sternberg's triangular theory of love?
Sternberg's model (intimacy, passion, commitment) describes what love is made of; Rusbult's investment model explains what predicts commitment specifically — satisfaction, alternatives and investment. This test measures the three predictors and derives a commitment score from them, rather than asking about commitment directly.
Explore all results in depth
Already taken the test, or just curious? Read the in-depth guide for any result — strengths, challenges, career matches, famous people, and FAQs.
Results Library content is educational, not a clinical assessment.