A wavering-commitment score usually means the three predictors in Rusbult's investment model — satisfaction, closed-off alternatives, investment — aren't telling a consistent story.
One might be genuinely solid while another is pulling the total down: real satisfaction alongside an appealing alternative, or heavy investment propping up a score that low satisfaction would otherwise sink. That mix is why "wavering" often feels less like a stable state and more like a live question the relationship hasn't settled. Reading the three subscale bars separately, rather than the single combined number, is what actually explains what's happening.
Strengths
- At least one base is likely doing real work, worth identifying rather than averaging away
- A mid-range score leaves room to move in either direction with deliberate change
- Ambivalence surfaced honestly is more useful than an inflated score papering over doubt
Growth Edges
- Rusbult's meta-analytic evidence links inconsistent bases to a higher chance of eventual breakup than a uniformly steady profile
- Easy to average the three inputs mentally instead of asking which one is actually low
- A wavering score under pressure (post-conflict, post-big-decision) may reflect the moment more than the pattern — retiming the test matters
Read More
- Satisfaction vs. Commitment: Why They're Not the Same Thing
- The Quality of Alternatives: Why "Could I Do Better?" Predicts So Much
- What Counts as "Investment" in a Relationship?
- How to Read Your Relationship Commitment Score
- Why Do People Stay in Relationships They're Not Happy In?
- What Is the Investment Model of Commitment?
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did I get a mid-range commitment score when I feel sure about my relationship?
A moderate total can hide a lopsided profile — genuinely high satisfaction dragged down by one weak base, often quality of alternatives or investment. Check the three subscale bars rather than the combined number; feeling sure usually shows up as a high satisfaction bar even when the overall score sits in the middle.
Is a wavering score a warning sign?
It's a signal to look closer, not a verdict. Le and Agnew's 2003 meta-analysis of the investment model found all three bases predict commitment and breakup risk, so an inconsistent profile is worth understanding — but which base is pulling the score down changes what, if anything, needs attention.
Can external stress lower this score temporarily?
Yes. Rusbult's original longitudinal work found satisfaction and commitment shift over time within the same couple, so a recent conflict, a stressful month, or a big unresolved decision can pull satisfaction down without reflecting a lasting pattern. Retaking the test after things settle gives a steadier read.
Which subscale should I look at first?
Whichever bar is lowest relative to the other two — that is the base actually dragging the total down. A low satisfaction bar points to unmet needs day to day; a low alternatives bar (this test's items are reverse-scored, so a high score means few appealing options) points to something pulling attention outward; a low investment bar points to how little has been built jointly so far.
How is quality of alternatives different from actively wanting to leave?
It measures how appealing the outside option looks in the abstract, not intent to act on it. Someone can score high on alternatives (few appealing options) while still being unhappy, or score low on alternatives while having no plans to leave — the three bases are separate inputs, not a single verdict.
Explore all results in depth
Already taken the test, or just curious? Read the in-depth guide for any result — strengths, challenges, career matches, famous people, and FAQs.
Results Library content is educational, not a clinical assessment.