Near-Flawless Deduction covers 23 to 25 correct answers out of 25, or 92 to 100 percent.
At most two questions were missed, so nearly every item was settled by what must be true rather than by what is likely or merely consistent with the statements. The result describes performance on these 25 JobCannon questions and nothing wider: the test has no published norms, no comparison group and no formal reliability study, so it cannot show how the score ranks against anyone else or how it carries over to other tasks. It is best read as a sign of careful reasoning from stated information.
Strengths
- Statements are treated as the only evidence: nothing outside them is added and nothing in them is dropped.
- Quantifiers such as "all", "some", "no" and "at least" keep their exact meaning through multi-step chains.
- Contrapositives are used without prompting: from "if A then B" and "not B", "not A" follows, while "B" on its own gives nothing.
- Options that go beyond the clues in a ranking, such as placing an item the clues never place, are rejected.
- With at most two misses on 25, there is little room for any one question type to be a blind spot.
Growth Edges
- The test has a ceiling: with 25 questions, one misread word moves a result between 23, 24 and 25, so small differences at the top carry little information.
- The questions are the same each time, so a repeat attempt mostly measures memory and says little about further skill.
- Valid is not the same as true: correct deduction from a premise nobody checked still gives a confident wrong answer, and the test only asks about the step.
- Real situations seldom state their premises cleanly, so deciding which statements to trust is usually the harder part of the work.
- Everyday evidence is mostly probable rather than certain, which is inductive reasoning, and "must be true" habits can be too strict there.
Career Matches
Read More
- Deductive Reasoning vs Inductive Reasoning Explained
- Syllogisms in Deductive Reasoning: Validity vs Truth
- Deductive Reasoning in Law and Civil Service Careers
- Deductive Reasoning in Consulting and Finance Careers
- Common Logical Fallacies: 10 Errors That Trip Up Smart People
- Logical Reasoning vs Critical Thinking: What’s the Difference?
Compare
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a Near-Flawless Deduction result mean?
It means 23 to 25 of the 25 questions were answered correctly, which is 92 to 100 percent. Nearly every question was settled by what the statements force. The band describes how the answers went on these JobCannon questions only. It is a score range on an in-house test, not a ranking against other people.
Is this a general intelligence score?
No. It covers one narrow skill, judging what must follow from given statements, across syllogisms, if-then rules, orderings and conclusions. The test has 25 questions, no published norms and no formal reliability study, so it says nothing about memory, creativity, maths or overall ability. Other skills can sit well above or well below this result.
Does a high score mean arguments at work will be judged correctly?
Not by itself. The test supplies the premises and asks only whether the conclusion follows. At work the premises are often unchecked, incomplete or only probable. A sound deduction from a weak premise still gives a weak answer, so the useful extra step is asking where each premise came from and how well it is supported.
Is there any point retaking the test to get 25 of 25?
Very little. The questions are fixed, so a repeat attempt mostly shows memory, and the gap between 24 and 25 is a single answer that can turn on one misread word. A better use of the time is harder material, such as multi-condition scheduling puzzles or an introductory formal logic text, where there is still something new to work out.
Explore all results in depth
Already taken the test, or just curious? Read the in-depth guide for any result — strengths, challenges, career matches, famous people, and FAQs.
Results Library content is educational, not a clinical assessment.